ArticlePloS one2026
A two-step iterative framework for signal and image deblurring using G-I-Nonexpansive Mappings.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces G-I-nonexpansive mapping by combining I-nonexpansive mapping with a directed graph. It also establishes convergence results for a two-step Ishikawa-type iteration. Numerical experiments were conducted on benchmark image deblurring problems, in which images were degraded by motion blur and additive Gaussian noise. The proposed method achieves competitive restoration performance, with peak signal-to-noise ratio values of up to 24.51 dB. It outperforms classical approaches such as Wiener filtering, Lucy-Richardson and the Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm while remaining comparable to Total variation (TV)-based methods. The method reliably enhances signals in 1D, achieving a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 29.73 dB and high structural similarity index measure values. These results suggest that the framework is an effective tool for restoring signals and images degraded by blur and noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.