ArticlePloS one2026
Characterisation of the bacterial and archaeal microbiota in processed colostrum collected from a spring-calving dairy herd.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colostrum feeding is critical for neonatal calf health, providing immunoglobulins (Ig) and other bioactive compounds that support immune function and early microbiome development. While the microbiota of fresh colostrum has been characterised, colostrum on commercial dairy farms is often refrigerated and reheated prior to feeding - practices that may alter its microbial composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterise the prokaryotic community of refrigerated and reheated (processed) colostrum collected immediately before calf feeding. Twenty-one processed colostrum samples were collected from a single, primi- and multiparous Holstein-Friesian and Jersey, spring-calving dairy herd with no more than two donors contributing to each sample. Colostrum samples were refrigerated for no more than 24h and then re-heated in a 38°C water bath for 60 minutes. Colostrum samples were collected immediately prior to being fed to the calf. Microbial DNA was extracted and16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were sequenced using the Illumina platform. Raw sequencing data were processed in R via the DADA2 pipeline, and an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table was generated. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138.1) and data were subjected to α- and β-diversity analysis using Phyloseq, Microbiome and Vegan. Breed and parity had no effect (P ≥ 0.05) on α- and β-diversity. The mean Shannon index score (α-diversity) was 2.26 (SE 0.18), indicating unevenness and low levels of richness. Microbial community composition varied considerably between samples. Five archaeal ASV genus groups were identified, with Methanobrevibacter dominating this community(relative abundance (RA) of 85.19%). Four bacterial phyla were identified as the major contributors to the bacterial component of processed colostrum. Only 39 ASV genus groups were identified as having a RA > 0.05%. Processed colostrum was dominated by Pseudomonas (RA = 20.97%) and Acinetobacter (RA = 18.65%). These genera, along with 11 others, including Romboutsia, Flavobacterium. Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group and Clostridium sensu stricto 1 were present across all samples and thus considered core bacteria. Overall, these findings indicate that refrigeration and reheating may significantly alter the natural colostrum microbiota, reduce diversity and increase heterogeneity of the community composition. Further research is needed to determine how these changes influence microbial seeding and calf health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.