ArticlePLOS mental health2026
A scoping review of Adverse, Benevolent, and Positive Childhood Experiences in military-connected children.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Military-connected children and young people face unique stressors, such as relocations, educational disruptions, loss of friendships and parental deployments, which can contribute to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). However, Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCEs) and Positive Childhood Experiences (PCEs) can act as protective factors. The military community offers stability, support, and strength, which may help buffer the effects of ACEs. Research into BCEs and PCEs for military-connected children is crucial to promoting positive outcomes and mitigating negative impacts over time. A scoping review was conducted to map literature regarding ACEs, BCEs and PCEs of Military Connected Children and Young People (MCCYP). Seven databases were searched (ASSIA, PsychARTICLES, PubMed, SAGE, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science), using key words and strategic search criteria. The Critical Skills Appraisal Program (CASP) tool was used for quality appraisal of the articles. Six papers met the inclusion criteria, of which five were USA based and one from the UK. All included articles focused on ACES, with one paper reporting PCEs in conjunction with ACEs. None were found regarding BCEs. Included articles contained research pertaining to current military connected children and the impact of ACEs on their current or future wellbeing. By undertaking the first scoping review explicitly examining ACEs, BCEs and PCEs among MCCYP, a significant gap in the evidence base was found.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.