Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42485042›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Mortality After Piperacillin-Tazobactam-Resistant vs -Susceptible Bloodstream Infection.

Erich Tusch, Barbara Holzknecht, Mikkel Lindegaard, Rikke Thoft Nielsen, Ulrik S Justesen, Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard, Tomislav Simeonov Kostyanev, Frederik Boëtius Hertz, Michael Pedersen, Ram B Dessau and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Erich TuschDepartment of Data Science and AI in Health, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barbara HolzknechtDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites, and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel LindegaardDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites, and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rikke Thoft NielsenDepartment of Data Integration and Analysis, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik S JustesenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Kirstine Kobberøe SøgaardDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tomislav Simeonov KostyanevDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Southern Denmark University Hospital, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Frederik Boëtius HertzDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Michael PedersenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Ram B DessauDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Sissel SkovgaardDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Jon Gitz HollerDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Lisbeth LützenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Southern Denmark University Hospital, Sygehus Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark.
Svend Ellermann-EriksenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ute Wolff SönksenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites, and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robert SkovEpidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lasse Engbo ChristiansenDepartment of Data Science and AI in Health, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Rhod LarsenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites, and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders HviidDepartment of Data Science and AI in Health, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anette M HammerumDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites, and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter BagerDepartment of Data Science and AI in Health, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Use of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) as treatment for bloodstream infections (BSIs) has increased over time in Europe, as has antimicrobial resistance to TZP in some European countries. Objective: To evaluate mortality associated with TZP-resistant BSIs in the Danish health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, data collected in near real time were obtained from Danish national health registers from November 15, 2018, through November 21, 2024. Participants were patients aged 18 years or older with monomicrobial Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae BSI, restricted to the first positive (index) blood culture with a TZP-susceptibility test result during the follow-up period. Exposures: E coli or K pneumoniae BSI and a TZP susceptibility test classified as TZP resistant or TZP susceptible. Main Outcome and Measures: Thirty-day mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for BSIs with TZP-resistant vs TZP-susceptible bacteria were estimated from the index date (blood culture) until death, emigration, or end of the observation period. Mortality was drawn from Danish national health registers, with no restriction on in-hospital or postdischarge mortality. Univariable and multivariable models adjusted a priori for self-reported gender, age, comorbidity, year, length of hospital stay until BSI, total length of inpatient stays in the prior year, and BSI in the prior 6 months with species other than that in the index culture. Results: The study population included 34 379 patients (median overall age, 76 years [IQR, 66-83 years]; 51.5% male). Among 28 649 patients (81.9%) with E coli BSI, 1689 (5.9%) had a TZP-resistant BSI; among 6314 patients (18.1%) with K pneumoniae BSI, 597 (9.5%) had a TZP-resistant BSI. There was no loss to follow-up, and about 1% of participants were right-censored by the end of the observation period (E coli: 343 [1.2%]; K pneumoniae, 88 [1.4%]). Mortality was similar for patients with TZP-resistant and TZP-susceptible BSI after adjusting for baseline risk factors (E coli: crude HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.08-1.38]; adjusted HR [AHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.94-1.27]; K pneumoniae: crude HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.05-1.52]; AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.94-1.41]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with monomicrobial E coli or K pneumoniae BSI, there was no significant difference in mortality for patients with BSI caused by TZP-resistant vs TZP-susceptible bacteria after adjustment for baseline risk factors. The result is important given increasing TZP resistance in Denmark and other countries.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaEscherichia coli InfectionsKlebsiella InfectionsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDenmarkDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFemaleHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID42485042
PMCPMC13392807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.