Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42485040›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Drinking Water Contaminant Exposures and Risk of Uterine Cancer.

Maya Spaur, Lydia Marcus Post, Laura E Beane Freeman, Danielle N Medgyesi, Jared A Fisher, Jessica M Madrigal, Samantha Ammons, Emma S Spielfogel, Komal Bangia, Alexander P Keil and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maya SpaurOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Lydia Marcus PostOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Laura E Beane FreemanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Danielle N MedgyesiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jared A FisherOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Jessica M MadrigalOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Samantha AmmonsOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Emma S SpielfogelDivision of Health Analytics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Komal BangiaCommunity and Environmental Epidemiology Research Branch, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, California.
Alexander P KeilOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
James V LaceyDivision of Health Analytics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Mary H WardOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Rena R JonesOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Some drinking water contaminants, including disinfection byproducts, are known or suspected carcinogens with endocrine-disrupting properties. Few epidemiologic studies have evaluated associations with uterine cancer. Objective: To investigate prospective associations between multiple regulated contaminants in drinking water and the risk of uterine cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The California Teachers Study is a prospective cohort of female California educators. Participants who were cancer-free and had not undergone hysterectomy at enrollment (1995-1996) were followed up through December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from November 2024 to October 2025. Exposures: The 15-year mean concentrations (1990-2005) of individual and total trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs), nitrate, arsenic, and uranium were calculated. The mixture effects of individual THMs, arsenic, uranium, and nitrate were also evaluated using quantile-based g-computation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations with incident uterine cancer overall, endometrioid tumors, and nonendometrioid tumors were analyzed categorically by tertile and continuously per log2 increase in water contaminant exposures, using Cox models adjusted for age, body mass index, and smoking status. Results: This study included 53 100 women (median [IQR] age, 50 [43-60] years) with enrollment addresses linked to a community water supply among women with residential duration at enrollment of 10 years or more. Higher levels of total THMs were associated with a higher risk of uterine cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02-1.38]; P for trend = .06) and endometrioid tumors specifically (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.05-1.46]; P for trend = .01). Positive associations were found for the individual THM chloroform. Higher levels of the sum of 5 HAAs were associated with nonendometrioid tumors (HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.06-3.25]; P for trend = .01), with similar associations for the HAA monochloroacetic acid. No associations were observed with nitrate, arsenic, or uranium levels. Associations per IQR increase in the drinking water contaminant mixture composed of individual THMs, nitrate, arsenic, and uranium were 1.21 (95% CI, 0.96-1.53) and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.04-1.74) for uterine and endometrioid histotypes, respectively. The THMs chloroform and dibromochloromethane were the major contributors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of female California educators, associations between drinking water THMs and uterine cancer overall and with endometrioid tumors specifically were consistent with findings from the only prior study, conducted in the midwestern US. Further investigation of drinking water contaminants as modifiable risk factors for this common gynecologic cancer is warranted.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterEnvironmental ExposureUterine NeoplasmsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNitratesProspective StudiesRisk FactorsDrinking WaterNitratesWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID42485040
PMCPMC13392805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.