ArticleSpine deformity2026
One in five cases of spondylolysis are missed on MRI: a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with back pain.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comment on "Does pelvic fixation impact reoperation outcomes for neuromuscular scoliosis surgery? A 10-year matched cohort analysis".Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLumbar spondylolysis is a common cause of pediatric low back pain. Although CT is highly sensitive, MRI is often used first to avoid radiation. Pars defects may be missed on MRI, potentially delaying care. The frequency and clinical impact of these missed diagnoses remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to assess how often spondylolysis is missed on MRI reports.
methodsA single-institution retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients with lumbar spondylolysis treated between 2021 and 2024. All patients underwent MRI for evaluation of low back pain. MRI reports were reviewed to determine whether spondylolysis was identified. STIR sequences were examined for pars hyperintensity. Demographic variables, radiologist fellowship training, and time from symptom onset to orthopaedic treatment were recorded. Groups with and without missed MRI diagnoses were compared using independent t tests and Chi-square analyses.
resultsAmong 102 patients with spondylolysis, 21 (20.6%) had MRI reports that failed to identify the pars defect. Among missed cases, 13/21 (61.9%) demonstrated hyperintense pars signal on STIR sequences that was not reported. Patients with missed MRI diagnoses had significantly longer delays to treatment initiation compared with those correctly diagnosed (10.6 ± 7.6 vs 6.7 ± 6.4 months from symptom onset; p = 0.042). Fellowship-trained musculoskeletal or neuroradiologists identified spondylolysis in 82.3% of cases compared with 64.7% among non-fellowship-trained radiologists, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.100).
conclusionLumbar spondylolysis is missed in ~ 20% of MRI reports, of which the majority demonstrate pathognomonic edema on the STIR sequence. This was associated with significant delays in treatment. There should be a high index of suspicion in pediatric patients with clinical histories suggestive of spondylolysis, even if MRI reports are negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.