ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2026
Regional adipose tissue redistribution and infiltration in primary osteoporosis: A comprehensive body composition study.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary osteoporosis (OP) has traditionally been viewed as a skeletal disorder; however, its complex interactions with muscle and adipose tissue are increasingly recognized. Nevertheless, the specific characteristics of body composition alterations in OP, particularly regional distribution and qualitative changes, and their independent roles remain poorly defined.
objectiveThis study aimed to systematically investigate the characteristics of whole-body and regional body composition changes in patients with primary osteoporosis, and to specifically assess the independent associations of paravertebral muscle fat infiltration and trunk-to-appendicular fat distribution with osteoporosis risk.
methodsBased on diagnostic criteria, participants were categorized into an OP group and a non-OP group. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess bone mineral density (BMD), muscle mass, and fat mass across the whole body and specific regions (trunk, limbs, upper limbs, lower limbs). Computed tomography (CT) was employed to quantitatively evaluate fat infiltration (represented by muscle density) in the psoas major, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles. Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess associations between body composition indicators. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were applied to examine the independent associations of fat infiltration and distribution with OP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of the identified adipose measures, with area under the curve (AUC) calculated before and after adjustment for confounders.dipose measures, with area under the curve (AUC) calculated before and after adjustment for confounders.
resultsCompared to the non-OP group, OP patients exhibited significant systemic alterations, including concurrent reductions in whole-body skeletal muscle mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content (all P < 0.01). Regional analysis revealed that bone and fat loss were more pronounced in the trunk than in the limbs (both P < 0.05). CT analysis revealed significantly lower muscle density in the paravertebral muscles of OP patients (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for sex, age, height, weight, total muscle mass, smoking, and alcohol consumption, multivariable logistic regression identified both decreased multifidus muscle density (OR: 0.98 per HU, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00; P = 0.023) and an increased limbs-to-trunk fat ratio (OR: 14.35, 95% CI: 2.90-76.35; P = 0.001) as factors independently associated with OP. Further analysis revealed distinct risk patterns: the limbs-to-trunk fat ratio demonstrated a significant linear dose-response relationship (P for overall association from RCS = 0.015). For multifidus muscle density, while a significant association was observed in the linear model, the more flexible RCS model did not confirm a significant overall association (P for overall = 0.065). ROC analysis showed that after adjustment, the limbs-to-trunk fat ratio had an AUC of 0.777, with a cut-off of 0.785 yielding 51.1% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity; multifidus muscle density had an adjusted AUC of 0.774, with a cut-off of 24.75 HU yielding 80.9% sensitivity and 46.8% specificity.
conclusionThis study characterizes the body composition profile of primary osteoporosis as a composite of changes, including proportional whole-body reduction of muscle and fat, preferential loss of trunk tissues, and significant fat infiltration in paravertebral muscles. Decreased multifidus muscle density and an increased limbs-to-trunk fat ratio are independently associated with OP, showing different association patterns. Both measures demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for osteoporosis after adjustment for confounders, with the limbs-to-trunk fat ratio showing higher specificity and multifidus muscle density showing higher sensitivity. These findings support the concept that OP is a systemic disorder involving bone, muscle, and adipose tissue, providing new perspectives for future risk assessment and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.