ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Baby face enlarges perceived reachable space.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans perceive reachable space (RS), the space within which they judge themselves to be able to touch or grasp an object or another person when extending their arms. Previous studies have reported that perceived RS toward another person expands when the person displays an angry facial expression, suggesting that humans adjust their interaction range based on others' facial characteristics. However, how babies' faces which have cuteness as a characteristic influences perceived RS remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of baby faces and the cuteness of others' faces on perceived RS. Two experiments were conducted using facial stimuli of babies and younger adults in a virtual reality environment. Experiment 1 measured perceived RS by focusing on facial cuteness, whereas Experiment 2 examined whether the results of Experiment 1 could be explained by the size constancy of the face stimuli. Experiment 2 also measured the perceived distance of the face stimuli. Participants judged whether they could reach the face stimuli at various distances while being instructed not to move their actual hands. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that perceived RS was not modulated by facial cuteness but was significantly larger for baby faces than for younger adult faces. Experiment 2 replicated the results of Experiment 1 and showed that size constancy did not account for perceived RS differences between face age conditions because perceived distances did not differ significantly between face age conditions. These findings suggest that baby faces, rather than facial cuteness, contribute to the expansion of perceived RS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.