Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484878›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Differences in the motor profiles of children and adolescents with ADHD in a clinically referred outpatient sample.

Josefine Rothe, Eleonora Sehmer, Tobias Riemschüssel, Veit Roessner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josefine RotheDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany. Josefine.Rothe@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-0958
Eleonora SehmerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Tobias RiemschüsselDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Veit RoessnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the co-occurrence of ADHD and motor deficits is well documented, it remains unclear which of the clinical presentations of ADHD (ADHD-PI: predominantly inattentive, ADHD-HI: predominantly hyperactive-impulsive, ADHD-C: combined) are associated with different motor deficits (fine motor, gross motor, combined). In this study, ADHD symptoms and motor skills were assessed as part of routine clinical evaluations in children and adolescents who were referred primarily due to suspected ADHD to an outpatient clinic for child and adolescent psychiatry (N = 419, 100 female, aged 4.22 to 16.82 years). The co-occurrence of ADHD-symptoms and different motor deficits was investigated using a categorical and a continuous approach, the former with odds ratios and Fisher's exact tests, the latter with latent profile analyses and Welch's-ANOVA. The results indicated that about 60% demonstrated at least one motor deficit. Girls were more likely than boys to exceed the threshold for ADHD-C symptoms, whereas the opposite pattern was observed in ADHD-HI. Beyond gender, there were no differences in overall or specific motor deficits between clinical presentations of ADHD. However, girls with ADHD-C were less likely to demonstrate overall motor deficits than girls with other clinical presentations of ADHD. Boys with ADHD-C showed motor deficits even more often than girls with ADHD-C. The results of the dimensional approach indicated that the three-profile solution, despite showing the second-best statistical fit, represented a stronger conceptual match with the DSM-5 classification in terms of clinical relevance and largely confirmed the findings of the categorical approach. In conclusion, only few gender-specific differences in motor deficits were identified across the distinct clinical presentations of ADHD, while is cannot be excluded that referral bias influenced the results. The present findings emphasise the importance of a comprehensive assessment of motor skills in children and adolescents with ADHD, regardless of gender and clinical presentations of ADHD.

Indexed as

ADHDGenderLatent profileMotor skillsOutpatients

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.