ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
A CNN-based liver ultrasound plane recognition system with multimodal large language model-generated interpretable feedback.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) for image recognition with a multimodal large language model (MLLM) for textual interpretation, and to evaluate its application value in identifying liver ultrasound standard planes (LUSPs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis multicenter study included 16,782 images in the standard dataset (training: 13508; testing: 3274), an internal validation set (3431 images), and an external validation set (5253 images). Using expert consensus as the reference standard, diagnostic performance was compared between students, junior radiologists, intermediate radiologists, senior radiologists, the AI model, and the same readers with AI assistance.
resultsThe CNN component of the system recognized 13 LUSPs and nonstandard planes (N-SPs) with an accuracy of 88.8% in the test set. In the validation set, the area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and kappa value of the AI model in identifying liver ultrasound planes were similar to those of senior radiologists (all p > 0.05). Except for the positive predictive value, the AI model outperformed students, junior radiologists, and intermediate radiologists in other diagnostic performance and these metrics also showed statistically significant improvement with hybrid AI system assistance under the conditions of this experimental setting (all p < 0.05). The model demonstrated robust generalizability across multiple centers, ultrasound devices, and diverse clinical scenarios.
conclusionThis hybrid AI system, combining CNN-based image identification with MLLM-generated interpretable feedback, demonstrates potential as an effective auxiliary tool for image quality control and standardized training, warranting further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.