ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Pharmacological potential of the marine peptide cyclo(L-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl) against both multidrug-resistant, gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii and gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus: structure - activity relationship, computational and experimental studies.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marine cyclic dipeptide, cyclo(phenylalanine-proline) (cFP), exhibits promising antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities. The balanced reactivity and stability of the compound, which are conducive to multi-target interactions, were identified using the density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) analysis predicted cFP's antimicrobial activity based on its structure-activity relationship. Antibacterial efficacy was determined by MIC and MBC with values of 200-250 µg/mL and 400-500 µg/mL, respectively, against Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus. Time-kill kinetics demonstrated bacteriostatic effects at sub-MIC concentrations, and bactericidal activity at higher concentrations, with 3D growth curves suggesting dose-dependent inhibition. The cFP mildly elevates intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), depletes the antioxidant glutathione, and, through ROS generation, only partially attenuated by N-acetylcysteine scavenging, indicating that redox perturbation contributes to, but does not solely account for, its antimicrobial activity. The cFP demonstrated potent antibiofilm potential, achieving a 79.3% reduction in mature biofilm biomass at 100 µg/mL, with marked fragmentation observed microscopically at sub-MIC doses. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) production was inhibited dose-dependently, exceeding 60% suppression at the highest concentrations. Furthermore, cFP significantly reduced bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity, thereby impairing adhesion mechanisms critical for biofilm formation. Molecular docking and 100 ns MD simulations suggest that cFP can form stable interactions with virulence-associated proteins, including FabI, AceR, GyrB, and SarA, which are established antibacterial or antivirulence targets with known reference ligands such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, novobiocin, and 2-[(methylamino)methyl]phenol, respectively. The cFP exhibited strong hemocompatibility with minimal hemolytic activity (< 5%), indicating low erythrocyte membrane toxicity. Taken together, the experimental and computational findings suggest that cFP is a promising antimicrobial lead and warrant further mechanistic and translational investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.