ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Multidimensional deep learning for grading and prognostic assessment of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an interpretable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based framework for preoperative histologic grading of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) and exploratory prognostic stratification. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on preoperative MRI from 333 IMCC patients across three centers (training cohort, n = 240; external validation cohort, n = 93). An ensemble deep learning (DL) framework synergizing 2.5D and 3D ResNet-50 architectures was constructed. Significant variables from clinical-laboratory-imaging (ClinLabImag) features, radiomics, and DL outputs were integrated into a combined model. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretability was evaluated with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) between risk groups.
resultsThe DL model achieved an external validation AUC of 0.804 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.712-0.896), significantly outperforming standalone 2.5D (p = 0.025) and 3D architectures (p = 0.030). The Combined model (AUC: 0.843 [95% CI, 0.749-0.938]) showed better external validation performance than the Radiomics (p = 0.019) and ClinLabImag models (p = 0.017), with only modest, non-significant improvement over the DL model (p = 0.355). SHAP analysis showed that DL features contributed most to model predictions. The Combined model showed exploratory OS differences between risk groups.
conclusionAn interpretable multidimensional MRI-based DL framework supports noninvasive preoperative grading in IMCC and provides exploratory prognostic information. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates an interpretable multidimensional MRI-based deep learning framework for preoperative grading and exploratory prognostic stratification of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, supporting individualized radiologic risk assessment before treatment. KEY POINTS: Reliable noninvasive MRI biomarkers are needed for preoperative grading and prognostic assessment of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma to guide individualized treatment planning. The combined multidimensional MRI model achieved favorable external validation performance and showed exploratory overall survival differences between IMCC risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.