ArticleCell and tissue banking2026
Tissue engineering of articular cartilage using nasal chondrocytes on alginate-chitosan-based composite scaffolds.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Articular cartilage defects present a significant clinical challenge due to the tissue's limited self-repair capacity. Tissue-engineered scaffolds that support cell survival, phenotype maintenance, and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation offer a promising strategy for restoring hyaline cartilage. In this study, we synthesized a composite scaffold composed of naturally derived biomaterials alginate and chitosan (AC), and a variant supplemented with type II collagen (CAC), and evaluated their pro-chondrogenic potential. Rabbit nasal septal chondrocytes (NSCs) were selected as the cellular component because of their high proliferative capacity and phenotypic stability. NSCs were seeded on to AC and CAC scaffolds and cultured for up to six weeks. Cell presence and distribution, histological morphology, ECM deposition, chondrogenic marker expression, and mechanical properties were assessed. Live/Dead imaging demonstrated sustained live-cell presence in both scaffold-types across all time-points. Histological analysis confirmed cellular infiltration into the scaffold interior, and Saf-O staining showed pericellular red staining at later time -points, suggestive of matrix deposition. Immunohistochemistry revealed increased staining over time of Sox9, aggrecan, and type II collagen, with CAC scaffolds exhibiting earlier temporal changes in aggrecan and type II collagen expression. Mechanical testing of cellular AC scaffolds showed a 15-fold increase in stiffness post-culture. These findings suggest that AC-based scaffolds, provide a supportive microenvironment for NSCs to infiltrate and express key chondrogenic markers. This composite system represents a simple and adaptable platform with potential utility for engineering cartilage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42484720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.