Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484629›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Two time scales of adaptation in human learning rates.

Jonas Simoens, Senne Braem, Pieter Verbeke, Haopeng Chen, Stefania Mattioni, Mengqiao Chai, Nicolas W Schuck, Tom Verguts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonas SimoensDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Senne BraemDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-8225
Pieter VerbekeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-1528
Haopeng ChenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefania MattioniDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-6118
Mengqiao ChaiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nicolas W SchuckInstitute of Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0150-8776
Tom VergutsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-4754

Funding

European Research Council 10.3030/852570European Research Council 10.3030/852669.Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11K5121NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G010319N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different situations may require radically different information updating speeds (i.e., learning rates). Some demand fast learning rates while others benefit from using slower ones. To adjust learning rates, decision makers could rely on either global, meta-learned differences between environments, or faster but transient adaptations to locally experienced prediction errors. Here, we introduce a new paradigm that allows researchers to measure and empirically disentangle both forms of adaptation. Participants performed short blocks of trials of a continuous estimation task - fishing for crabs - on six different islands that required different optimal (initial) learning rates. Across two experiments, participants showed fast adaptations in learning rate within a block. Critically, participants also learned global environment-specific learning rates over the time course of the experiment, as evidenced by computational modelling and by the learning rates calculated on the very first trial when revisiting an environment (i.e., unconfounded by transient adaptations). Using representational similarity analyses of fMRI data, we found that differences in voxel pattern responses in the central orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) correlated with differences in these global environment-specific learning rates. Our findings show that humans adapt learning rates at both slow and fast time scales, and that the central OFC may support meta-learning by representing environment-specific task-relevant features such as learning rates.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalLearningPrefrontal CortexAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTime FactorsYoung Adulthumanlearning ratemeta-learningneuroscienceorbitofrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID42484629
PMCPMC13391084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.