Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484357›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2026

Retrospective Evaluation of Safety of Using a Semi-automatic Robotic System for Transthoracic Biopsy of Lung Mass Under Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography Guidance.

Mudalsha Ravina, Ranganath Ganga, Rutuja Kote, Prateek Prasanth, Ajoy K Behera, Praveen Kumar Dubey, Ramkishore Velmurugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mudalsha RavinaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-3778
Ranganath GangaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-747X
Rutuja KoteDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Prateek PrasanthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Ajoy K BeheraDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Praveen Kumar DubeyDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Ramkishore VelmuruganDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLung cancer poses unique challenges due to heterogeneity in tumor and metastatic cellular composition. The use of MATERIAL AND

methodsForty consecutive patients underwent whole-body PET-CT imaging following which they underwent transthoracic biopsy, using a semi-automatic robotic biopsy system (Maxio

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 57.08±12.39 years, and the mean maximum standardized uptake value was 16.71±8.61. PET-CT revealed a unilateral lung mass in 92.5% (n = 37) and bilateral lesions in 7.5% (n = 3) of patients. Heterogeneous

conclusionSemiautomatic robotic assistance can be a safe option for diagnosing intrathoracic mass lesions, with an acceptable diagnostic yield.

Indexed as

lung biopsyLung cancerpositron emission tomographyrobotic biopsythoracic imaging

Identifiers

PMID42484357
PMCPMC13548729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.