Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484307›Full record

ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026

Liver Biopsy in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Potential Pitfalls and Solutions.

Eric J Lawitz, Fred Poordad, Zachary D Goodman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Liver Biopsy in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Potential Pitfalls and Solutions.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric J LawitzThe Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-224X
Fred PoordadThe Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-1569
Zachary D GoodmanCenter for Liver Disease, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver biopsy is the reference standard for the evaluation of inflammation and fibrosis in MASH and is the primary endpoint in steatohepatitis clinical trials. An optimal liver biopsy is generally considered to be obtained with a 16-gauge needle, measure at least 2 cm in length and contain at least 10 complete portal tracts, although these features have not been prospectively validated as mandatory thresholds in MASH trials. Published clinical trials for MASH have not consistently reported sufficient details of liver biopsy quality (needle gauge, length, number of portal tracts) at baseline or post-treatment, and biopsy quality metrics are rarely reported separately by treatment arm. Placebo response rates in clinical trials for MASH varied widely (2% to 34%) and this variation could influence the outcomes of clinical trials. Future MASH trials should report biopsy quality metrics (needle gauge, core length and portal tract count) by treatment arm in supplementary appendices of those publications, treat the 16-gauge/≥ 2 cm/≥ 10 portal tract criteria as preferred acquisition standards rather than required thresholds, and may consider pre-specified sensitivity analyses restricted to biopsies meeting adequacy criteria, recognising that such exclusions may alter the disease spectrum and must be interpreted cautiously. Biopsy quality is a plausible contributor to variability in placebo responses and trial outcomes, but direct evidence that needle gauge, core length, or portal tract number independently affect histologic response rates in randomised MASH trials remains limited. As digital pathology/AI tools mature and NIT-based surrogate endpoints advance toward regulatory qualification, ensuring high quality histologic reference standards remains essential.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFatty LiverLiverBiopsyHumansclinical trialshistologyliver biopsyMASHserious adverse events

Identifiers

PMID42484307
PMCPMC13390309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.