ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026
Liver Biopsy in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Potential Pitfalls and Solutions.
Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liver Biopsy in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Potential Pitfalls and Solutions.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver biopsy is the reference standard for the evaluation of inflammation and fibrosis in MASH and is the primary endpoint in steatohepatitis clinical trials. An optimal liver biopsy is generally considered to be obtained with a 16-gauge needle, measure at least 2 cm in length and contain at least 10 complete portal tracts, although these features have not been prospectively validated as mandatory thresholds in MASH trials. Published clinical trials for MASH have not consistently reported sufficient details of liver biopsy quality (needle gauge, length, number of portal tracts) at baseline or post-treatment, and biopsy quality metrics are rarely reported separately by treatment arm. Placebo response rates in clinical trials for MASH varied widely (2% to 34%) and this variation could influence the outcomes of clinical trials. Future MASH trials should report biopsy quality metrics (needle gauge, core length and portal tract count) by treatment arm in supplementary appendices of those publications, treat the 16-gauge/≥ 2 cm/≥ 10 portal tract criteria as preferred acquisition standards rather than required thresholds, and may consider pre-specified sensitivity analyses restricted to biopsies meeting adequacy criteria, recognising that such exclusions may alter the disease spectrum and must be interpreted cautiously. Biopsy quality is a plausible contributor to variability in placebo responses and trial outcomes, but direct evidence that needle gauge, core length, or portal tract number independently affect histologic response rates in randomised MASH trials remains limited. As digital pathology/AI tools mature and NIT-based surrogate endpoints advance toward regulatory qualification, ensuring high quality histologic reference standards remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.