Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42484248›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2026

Stress distribution and bone deformation around narrow-diameter implants at different placement depths and in different bone densities.

Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa, Vanessa Felipe Vargas-Moreno, Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado, Suzana Peres Pimentel, Mônica Grazieli Corrêa, Mabelle Freitas Monteiro, Fabiano Ribeiro Cirano, Ricardo Armini Caldas, Márcio Zaffalon Casati

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabricia Teixeira BarbosaUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8478-5903
Vanessa Felipe Vargas-MorenoUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-6297
Raissa Micaella Marcello-MachadoUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7661-703X
Suzana Peres PimentelUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-8600
Mônica Grazieli CorrêaUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1895-3283
Mabelle Freitas MonteiroUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-4349
Fabiano Ribeiro CiranoUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7331-4612
Ricardo Armini CaldasUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Department of Dentistry, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-4744
Márcio Zaffalon CasatiUniversidade Paulista - Unip, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-0536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the biomechanical behavior of narrow-diameter Morse taper implants (3.5 mm) placed in bone of different densities and at different depths, using finite element analysis. Sixteen three-dimensional virtual models, meshed with tetrahedral elements, were created. Each model comprised cortical bone, cancellous bone, a Morse taper implant, an abutment, and a single maxillary central incisor crown. An oblique force (30 degrees buccally) of 150 N was applied to evaluate peri-implant stress distribution across four bone densities (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and at four placement depths (0, 1, 2, and 3 mm). The interfaces were modeled as perfectly bonded, except at the implant-abutment interface (friction coefficient = 0.3). All materials were assumed to be linearly elastic and isotropic. After a nonlinear analysis, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, maximum principal strain, and Mohr-Coulomb ratio were recorded. The results revealed a stress distribution pattern with lower peak stress values at shallower placement depths and in D1 bone. All groups showed a similar trend: as the implant placement depth increased, the point of greatest stress concentration shifted apically. Implant placement in cortical bone provided a protective effect under oblique loads. In D3 and D4 bone types, crestal placement showed better biomechanical performance than subcrestal placement.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone-Implant InterfaceDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental Stress AnalysisBiomechanical PhenomenaCancellous BoneCortical BoneDental Prosthesis DesignFinite Element AnalysisHumansReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID42484248
PMCPMC13384381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.