ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026
In vivo tolerability of topical telavancin versus vancomycin in a murine ocular model.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Recommendations, Antibiotic Resistance, and Emerging Treatments for Gram-Positive Ocular Infections in the United States.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulticentre surveillance studies show increasing resistance among ocular MDR bacteria causing sight-threatening infections, especially MRSA. MRSA is associated with poor visual outcomes despite treatment with topical fortified vancomycin (25-50 mg/mL), the current standard of care. We previously demonstrated that telavancin exhibits approximately 16-fold greater in vitro potency than vancomycin against ocular MRSA isolates, with lower cytotoxicity.
objectivesTo compare the in vivo ocular tolerability of topical telavancin and vancomycin at 25 and 50 mg/mL in a murine maximum-tolerated-dose model.
methodsImmunocompetent female BALB/c mice (n = 24; six groups, four/group) received 20 instillations, 15 min apart over 5 h, of telavancin or vancomycin (25 or 50 mg/mL) or matching vehicles [250 or 500 mg/mL hydroxy-propyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) for telavancin; 0.9% NaCl for vancomycin]. Ocular irritation was graded 30 min after the final dose and cage-side observations were recorded 1, 3 and 5 h.
resultsVancomycin showed dose-dependent toxicity. At 25 mg/mL, all mice (4/4) exhibited hyperaemia, chemosis and eyelid closure; at 50 mg/mL, all had eyelid closure, chemosis, hyperaemia and corneal dryness, and 2/4 had white discharge. Telavancin 25 mg/mL was well tolerated: only 1/4 displayed mild chemosis and squinting, with no eyelid closure. Telavancin 50 mg/mL caused eyelid closure, chemosis and hyperaemia in 4/4 mice. The 250 mg/mL vehicle caused no clinically relevant ocular changes, although 1/4 mice showed squinting; 500 mg/mL vehicle induced mild chemosis and hyperaemia in 4/4 mice.
conclusionsThe telavancin 25 mg/mL formulation was better tolerated than the fortified vancomycin formulation tested in this model. These findings support further preclinical evaluation for MDR Gram-positive ocular infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.