ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Predicting gingival embrasure risk after invisible orthodontics using multimodal data and machine learning.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a risk prediction model for gingival embrasures after clear aligner therapy using multimodal oral data.
methodsA retrospective study of 340 patients (December 2022-June 2025) was randomly divided into training (n = 238) and validation (n = 102) sets (7:3). Univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were applied to identify independent risk factors. Three machine learning models - random forest (RF), logistic regression, and support vector machine - were constructed based on seven core variables. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values for interpretability.
resultsNo significant baseline differences existed between sets (p > 0.05). Seven indicators were identified (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed percentage of bleeding on probing-positive sites, interproximal alveolar bone height, and relative movement of adjacent teeth at target site as independent risk factors, while gingival thickness, proximal contact area, interdental papilla height, and buccal/lingual bone plate thickness were protective factors (p < 0.05). The RF model performed best: training AUC = 0.849 (95% CI: 0.786-0.912), validation AUC = 0.815 (95% CI: 0.720-0.910), with good calibration and net benefit. SHAP analysis highlighted gingival thickness and interproximal alveolar bone height as key predictors.
conclusionA risk prediction model for post-clear aligner gingival embrasures was successfully developed and validated using multimodal oral data, with RF as the optimal algorithm. The model exhibits good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, which can be used as an objective auxiliary tool for individualized risk prediction following clear aligner therapy and supplement traditional clinical empirical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.