Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483875›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2026

Application of large language models to the annotation of cell lines and mouse strains in genomics data.

Sanja Rogic, B Ogan Mancarci, Brianna Xu, Anna Xiao, Carlton Yan, Paul Pavlidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanja RogicMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-3661
B Ogan MancarciMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Brianna XuMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Anna XiaoMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Carlton YanMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Paul PavlidisMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-5028

Funding

Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01MH111099 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016-0599NIH HHS MH111099NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate, consistent and comprehensive metadata are essential for the reuse of functional genomics data deposited in repositories such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), however, achieving this often requires careful manual curation, which is time-consuming, costly and prone to errors. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on OpenAI's GPT-4o, as an assistive tool for entity-to-ontology annotation of two commonly encountered descriptors in transcriptomic experiments, mouse strains and cell lines. Using over 9 000 manually curated experiments from the Gemma database and over 5 000 associated journal articles, we assess the model's ability to identify relevant free-text entries and map them to appropriate ontology terms. Using zero-shot prompting and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to incorporate domain-specific ontology knowledge, GPT-4o correctly annotated 77% of mouse strain and 59% of cell line experiments, and uncovered manual curation errors in Gemma for over 200 experiments (2% of total). GPT-4o substantially outperformed non-LLM alternatives, and was statistically indistinguishable from the highest-performing 2026 frontier models. Model errors often arose from typographical mistakes or inconsistent naming in the GEO record or publication, and resembled those made by human curators. Along with annotations, our approach requests that the model output supporting context and verbatim quotes from the sources. These were typically accurate and enabled rapid curator verification. We further found that for the difficult cell line task, an ensemble of LLMs can boost precision at the cost of recall. These findings suggest that while LLMs are not ready to fully replace manual curators, they can effectively support them. A human-in-the-loop workflow, in which LLM's annotations are provided to human curators for validation, should improve the efficiency and quality of large-scale biomedical metadata curation.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticData CurationGenomicsLarge Language ModelsMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsBiocurationCell LineMice

Identifiers

PMID42483875
PMCPMC13389303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.