Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483838›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Electrostatic Gaussian Transistor for Real-Time Probabilistic Inference.

Youngmin Han, Youngwoo Yoo, Minseo Kim, Dinithi Jayasuriya, Nethmi Jayasinghe, Akshay Subramanian, Deep Jariwala, Chang-Hyun Kim, Amit Ranjan Trivedi, Young-Joon Kim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Youngmin HanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2853-6232
Youngwoo YooDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3084-2631
Minseo KimDepartment of Semiconductor Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Dinithi JayasuriyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9229-3590
Nethmi JayasingheDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6316-5959
Akshay SubramanianStevenson High School, Lincolnshire, Illinois, USA.
Deep JariwalaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-8768
Chang-Hyun KimSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-6335
Amit Ranjan TrivediDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Young-Joon KimDepartment of Semiconductor Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3511-3438
Hocheon YooDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-3327

Funding

Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation IITP-(2025)-RS-2023-00253914Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) RS-2025-00558813National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00438999National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2025-25403895National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2026-25493157National Science Foundation 2046435National Science Foundation 2317974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian distribution functions underpin a wide range of probabilistic computing models, yet their faithful and tunable implementation at the hardware level remains a fundamental challenge. Conventional approaches based on anti-ambipolar transistors rely on heterojunctions formed from dissimilar semiconducting materials, introducing intrinsic asymmetries in carrier mobility, interface quality, and band alignment that prevent accurate mirroring of symmetric Gaussian curves. Here we report a single-material, single-channel split-gate Gaussian-mirroring transistor (SC-GMT) that generates symmetric, Gaussian-shaped transfer curves through reversal voltage biasing. By independently modulating carrier concentrations via split-gate control, the device achieves tunable amplitude, mean, and standard deviation with >99.99% coefficient of determination to ideal Gaussian distributions. To demonstrate practical utility, we integrate the SC-GMT into a custom-built printed circuit board with digital-to-analog control and real-time current sensing. Using this platform, we implement a hardware Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) classifier capable of distinguishing deepfake and authentic voices with 82% accuracy. Moreover, the transistor's drain current scales with the product of two gate voltages, enabling quadratic-order analog multiplication critical for probabilistic models and attention-based architectures.

Indexed as

Deepfake voice classificationGaussian‐mirroring transistorGaussian naive bayesQuadratic‐order productionSplit‐gate structure

Identifiers

PMID42483838
PMCPMC13579221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.