ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
A stacking based deep learning framework integrating random search neural architecture search for meniscus tear diagnosis.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate and rapid diagnosis of meniscal tears is crucial for effective management of sports-related injuries and degenerative knee disorders. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for meniscus evaluation; however, manual interpretation is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. Automated and reliable classification systems may therefore support clinical decision-making. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a robust and interpretable deep learning framework for the automatic four-class classification of meniscal conditions using MRI images.
methodsA total of 2,000 knee MRI images obtained from a tertiary care university hospital were categorized into four classes: Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, and normal meniscus. A Random Search-based Neural Architecture Search (RS-NAS) strategy was used to generate task-specific CNN architectures. The class probability outputs of the top-performing NAS-derived CNN models were combined using a late-fusion stacking strategy, with ElasticNet employed as the meta-learner. The proposed framework was evaluated using both a single-run assessment and a repeated validation protocol consisting of 10 independent runs with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using ACC, F1-score, MCC, AUC, and PR-AUC. Statistical comparisons and explainability analyses, including Grad-CAM and ElasticNet feature importance, were also performed.
resultsIn the single-run evaluation, the ElasticNet-based stacking model achieved an ACC of 0.9300, F1-score of 0.9304, and AUC of 0.9913. Under the repeated 10-run 5-fold cross-validation protocol, the proposed model obtained an ACC of 0.9083 ± 0.0019, F1-score of 0.9084 ± 0.0018, MCC of 0.8783 ± 0.0024, AUC of 0.9883 ± 0.0008, and PR-AUC of 0.9719 ± 0.0020. The proposed stacking framework outperformed the best NAS CNN, DenseNet121-TL, averaging ensemble, and majority voting ensemble across the main evaluation metrics. Grad-CAM visualizations and feature importance analysis further indicated that the model relied on clinically meaningful image regions and informative base-model predictions.
conclusionsThe integration of RS-NAS with ElasticNet-based late-fusion stacking provides a stable, high-performing, and interpretable framework for four-class meniscus MRI classification. Although the single-run evaluation showed higher peak performance, the repeated cross-validation results provide a more reliable estimate of model robustness and generalization. Future studies should validate the proposed framework using independent multi-center datasets and different imaging protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.