ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Anatomical Variations and Surgical Implications of the Cervical Branch of the Facial Nerve: A Systematic Review.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cervical branch of the facial nerve (CBFN) innervates the platysma and contributes to lower facial animation. Due to its anatomical variability and proximity to critical structures, including the marginal mandibular branch, great auricular nerve, and submandibular gland, it is vulnerable to iatrogenic injury during neck dissection and rhytidectomy, which can lead to functional and aesthetic complications. This systematic review evaluates the CBFN's course, branching patterns, and surgical relevance. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies included anatomical or cadaveric investigations detailing the CBFN's trajectory, branching, and anastomoses. Of 402 screened records, 10 met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on topography and inter-nerve communications. Risk of bias was assessed using a qualitative appraisal tool due to the anatomical nature of the studies. The CBFN presented as a single trunk in 61.3% to 80% of specimens and as double branches in 20% to 38.7%. Anastomoses occurred with the transverse cervical (16%-100%), great auricular (24%-38.7%), and marginal mandibular nerves (24%). The CBFN coursed deep to the platysma in all cases and inferior to the mandible, though its relation to the cervical fascia and submandibular gland varied. Injury may indirectly affect the marginal mandibular branch via anastomoses, resulting in lower lip paresis. The cervical branch exhibits substantial anatomical variation, particularly in its branching and inter-nerve connections. Intraoperative preservation requires meticulous dissection technique, and the high frequency of anastomoses highlights the need for caution during subplatysmal dissection in cervicofacial surgery. Further anatomical standardization studies are recommended to refine operative planning and improve surgical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.