Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483663›Full record

ReviewSmall science2026

Basic Notions and Innovations in Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment.

Fida Tanos, Chaimaa Gomri, Clément Trellu, Mehmet A Oturan, Shuaishuai Li, Minghua Zhou, Kehinde D Jayeola, Omotayo A Arotiba, Elisama Vieira Dos Santos, Carlos A Martínez-Huitle and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fida TanosInstitut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR 5635 Univ Montpellier Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) ENSCM Montpellier France.
Chaimaa GomriInstitut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR 5635 Univ Montpellier Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) ENSCM Montpellier France.
Clément TrelluLaboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement Université Gustave Eiffel Marne-la-Vallée France.
Mehmet A OturanLaboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement Université Gustave Eiffel Marne-la-Vallée France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-1090
Shuaishuai LiMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Technology for Complex Trans-Media Pollution Tianjin Advanced Water Treatment Technology International Joint Research Center College of Environmental Science and Engineering Nankai University Tianjin China.
Minghua ZhouMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Technology for Complex Trans-Media Pollution Tianjin Advanced Water Treatment Technology International Joint Research Center College of Environmental Science and Engineering Nankai University Tianjin China.
Kehinde D JayeolaDepartment of Chemical Sciences University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa.
Omotayo A ArotibaDepartment of Chemical Sciences University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-8684
Elisama Vieira Dos SantosRenewable Energies and Environmental Sustainability Research Group Institute of Chemistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-5694
Carlos A Martínez-HuitleRenewable Energies and Environmental Sustainability Research Group Institute of Chemistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-5426
Mikhael BechelanyInstitut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR 5635 Univ Montpellier Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) ENSCM Montpellier France.
Marc CretinInstitut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR 5635 Univ Montpellier Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) ENSCM Montpellier France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural water bodies are increasingly contaminated by synthetic organic compounds from industrial, agricultural, and domestic sources. Many of these compounds, for instance, pharmaceuticals, dyes, and pesticides, are chemically stable and cannot be efficiently eliminated by the classical wastewater treatment technologies, resulting in their persistence in surface and groundwater. Therefore, innovative strategies are required. Here, we reviewed electrochemical methods, such as anodic oxidation, electro-Fenton, photo-assisted catalysis, and electrochemical activation of persulfate and peroxymonosulfate, to remove recalcitrant organic pollutants from contaminated water. These methods generate reactive species that break down persistent contaminants. As the performance of these methods is affected by operational parameters, such as the type of electrode material, the applied current and the chemical composition of the solution, a fine-tuning of these parameters can enhance the removal efficiency of pollutant from water. We also discuss the contribution of computational modeling methods to obtain mechanistic insights that are crucial for developing and optimizing electrochemical water treatment technologies.

Indexed as

anodic oxidationelectrochemical advanced oxidation processeselectro‐Fentonemerging contaminantsnanomaterialswastewater treatmentwater scarcity

Identifiers

PMID42483663
PMCPMC13387353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.