ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2026
Multicentre retrospective real-world evidence study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in ulcerative colitis: 52-Week results from an expanded international two-center retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mirikizumab (MIRI), a selective IL-23 p19 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in randomised trials in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but real-world data remain limited, particularly in highly treatment-exposed populations. Aim: To assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of MIRI in adults with moderately to severely active UC. Material and methods: This retrospective multicentre study included 257 adults with UC initiating MIRI before 31 January 2026 across 21 Polish centres. Induction consisted of intravenous MIRI 300 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, with optional extension to week 24 in cases of insufficient response. Disease activity was assessed at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24 using clinical, endoscopic, and laboratory parameters. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE). Results: Most patients had prior exposure to advanced therapy, and 54.1% underwent extended induction. Significant improvement was observed at weeks 12 and 24 across all parameters. Among evaluable patients, clinical remission was 31.7% at week 12 and 41.8% at week 24, while clinical response was 76.2% and 79.3%, respectively. Endoscopic remission was 9.5% and 18.5%, whereas endoscopic response was 67.1% and 64.8%, respectively. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission was 23.1% and 26.4%. AE occurred in 9.1% and 14.1% of patients, and SAE in 2.6% and 6.6%. Conclusions: In this large real-world study with predominantly advanced therapy-exposed UC, MIRI was associated with significant clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical improvement through weeks 12 and 24, with a favourable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.