ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Overcoming barriers in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome research: the CureME participatory model.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) presents unique challenges. These stem from the logistical difficulties created by the degree of disability experienced and heterogeneous diagnostic criteria driven by etiological uncertainty. This is compounded by distrust of research institutions within the ME/CFS community, due to historical mischaracterization of ME/CFS as a psychosomatic disease. This commentary proposes a framework to address the resulting methodological and practical barriers. The CureME Framework draws on the UK ME/CFS Biobank's extensive experience of participatory research and incorporates strategies for effective recruitment and data collection. It is informed by collaborations with individuals with lived experience of ME/CFS including severely affected individuals. This is achieved by integrating co-produced study design, community-engaged recruitment, and adaptations that minimize the cognitive and physical burden of participation. This increases access to research participation, reduces selection bias, and strengthens cohort representativeness. Adopting this approach may enhance methodological rigor, accessibility, trust, cohort representativeness, statistical power, and ethical integrity in ME/CFS research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.