Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Challenges and strategies for harnessing large language models in plant protection.

Xiangshuai Li, Wenjie Shangguan, Lidong Cao, Huizhu Yuan, Xiaojing Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiangshuai Li *State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenjie Shangguan *State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lidong CaoState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huizhu YuanState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaojing YanState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored as intelligent tools for plant protection, with potential applications in pest and disease monitoring, control decision-making, plant quarantine, pesticide development, and precision application. However, their deployment in plant protection remains constrained by limited contextual adaptation to local agroecological conditions, insufficient reliability of single generalist models across diverse tasks, and high computational and energy costs. This Perspective summarizes current application directions of LLM-driven plant protection and analyzes the major barriers limiting their practical use. We further discuss mitigation strategies, including domain-specific fine-tuning, knowledge-graph grounding, GraphRAG, multi-agent collaboration, model compression, and hierarchical edge-cloud deployment. We argue that future LLM-based plant protection systems should be lightweight, evidence-grounded, locally adaptive, and governed by clear data-security boundaries to support sustainable and reliable agricultural decision-making.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedomain-specific large modelsintegrated pest managementlarge language modelsplant protectionsmart agriculture

Identifiers

PMID42483505
PMCPMC13385631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.