ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Integrating clinical decision support systems, nursing vigilance, and physician prescribing patterns to reduce preventable adverse drug events: a structured evidence-based narrative review on human-AI interface in medication safety.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) remain a major source of hospital morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) were developed to reduce unsafe prescribing, yet evidence of their real-world effectiveness remains mixed. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offers new opportunities to enhance medication safety but also introduces risks such as algorithmic bias, technology-induced error, and reduced clinician vigilance. Objectives: This narrative review critically examines: (1) evidence for the effectiveness of CDSS in reducing preventable ADEs; (2) human factors influencing interactions between clinicians and AI-enabled safety tools; and (3) conceptual, methodological, and governance challenges affecting the safe implementation of digital health technologies. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using the SANRA framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance where applicable. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore covered literature published between January 2015 and March 2024, supplemented by seminal earlier studies. Following eligibility screening, 75 studies were included in a thematic synthesis and quality appraisal using established risk-of-bias tools. Results: Five themes emerged: the transition from passive to adaptive decision support; AI's dual role as both a safety enhancer and a source of new risks; persistent alert fatigue; the often-overlooked contribution of nursing vigilance; and gaps in equity, governance, and technology-induced error research. From these findings, we propose the Clinical Safety Intelligence Loop (CSIL), a conceptual framework that positions AI within a sociotechnical system while embedding equity, governance, and continuous feedback as core components. Conclusion: Achieving medication safety improvements requires moving beyond technology-focused solutions toward systems-level approaches integrating AI, clinician cognition, organizational culture, and governance. The CSIL offers a useful framework for guiding this transformation, although further empirical validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.