Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Bridging the gap in pediatric cancer rehabilitation care: a multi-perspective survey study.

Filip Jevič, Anna Vašinová, Aleš Rak, Andrea Kašparová, Marie Ohnisková, Adelaida Dizonová, Kristýna Pospíšilová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filip JevičDepartment of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol and Homolka University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Anna VašinováSecond Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Aleš RakSecond Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Andrea KašparováDepartment of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol and Homolka University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Marie OhniskováDepartment of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol and Homolka University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Adelaida DizonováSecond Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Kristýna PospíšilováDepartment of Gender and Sociology, Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation is a fundamental pillar of supportive care in pediatric oncology, yet its delivery faces significant systemic barriers. Data on rehabilitation accessibility and provider readiness in Central Europe remain limited. Objectives: This study examined the rehabilitation needs of pediatric oncology patients aged 0-19 years both during and after treatment - including accessibility, barriers, and stakeholder readiness - from the perspectives of parents, physiotherapists, and rehabilitation physicians. Methods: Three parallel questionnaire surveys were conducted among parents of children with cancer ( Results: While 63.7% of parents reported their child required rehabilitation during active treatment, only 53.3% ultimately received it - an unmet need rate of 10.4% that rose to 13.3% after treatment completion. Lymphoma and spinal cord tumor patients showed the highest unmet need rates across both phases. Rehabilitation proved a long-term necessity: 29.5% of children required therapy for more than six months during treatment, rising to 47.6% post-treatment. A critical education gap was identified: 80% of physiotherapists and 74% of rehabilitation physicians rated their graduation-level knowledge as insufficient, a deficit persisting in nearly half of professionals in current practice. Qualitative analysis revealed structural barriers including informational deficits, insufficient regional infrastructure, and professional uncertainty regarding patient safety. Despite these hurdles, 66% of physiotherapists and 54% of physicians expressed interest in joining a specialized competence network (RehaSÍŤ). Conclusion: The findings confirm a substantial gap between chronic rehabilitation demand and healthcare system capacity. Professional reluctance reflects insufficient training rather than lack of motivation. Establishing targeted educational programs and a structured competence network such as RehaSÍŤ may be key to ensuring equitable access to high-quality supportive care.

Indexed as

access gapCzech Republicmulti-perspective surveypediatric oncologyphysiotherapyrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42483410
PMCPMC13385515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.