ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Knowledge and awareness of female genital cosmetic surgery among healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) became popular in recent decades. Many patients worldwide consider these procedures for medical or esthetic reasons. Previous literature indicates a significant gap in public understanding of the risks, benefits, and recovery processes associated with FGCS. This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers in Makkah clusters regarding FGCS. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 142 participants from Makkah cluster facilities, including general practitioners (GPs), gynecologists, surgeons, nurses, medical interns, and medical students, from July to September 2025. Data was analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used to measure knowledge and awareness levels, and to assess the associations between cultural beliefs and awareness. Results: Most of the respondents were females and residents. Consultants and specialists showed a lower agreement on having adequate knowledge of FGCS. About 78.2% of workers felt they lacked adequate knowledge of FCGS. Only 26.8% felt confident about labiaplasty, and <10% in other procedures. Nearly half of the participants were not sufficiently aware of the procedures' risks. During GPs' consultations of FGCS, the most used information sources were anatomy books. Relationship difficulties and body dysmorphia were the most common identified psychological issues by GPs. Partners' comments were the most significant social factor influencing women's decisions in these procedures. Furthermore, GPs were often seen as educators. Conclusion: The study reveals a significant gap in knowledge and confidence among healthcare providers in FGCS. Creating accessible materials and educating healthcare providers can raise awareness and the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.