Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42483270›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2026

Prognostic Factors in Upper Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes.

Erdoğan Şeyran, Azer Gökmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erdoğan ŞeyranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Azer GökmenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with limited prognostic data. This study aimed to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics and to identify clinically relevant prognostic factors, with a particular focus on simple and readily available inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers that may support routine risk stratification. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 54 patients with histologically confirmed esophageal or gastric NEC were analyzed. Clinical, pathological, laboratory, treatment, and survival data were collected. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The median OS was 17.9 months. On univariate analysis, metastatic disease, elevated LDH, elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hypoalbuminemia, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia remained the only independent predictor of worse survival (HR 2.876, 95% CI 1.116-7.414; p = 0.029). Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia emerged as a potential independent prognostic factor in this cohort and may serve as a simple and readily available marker of poor outcome. Albumin, LDH, and NLR may provide additional prognostic information in patients with upper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, these findings should be considered exploratory and require validation in larger prospective multicenter studies.

Indexed as

albumininflammationlactate dehydrogenaseneutrophil-to-lymphocyte rationutritional statusoverall survivalprognosisupper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42483270
PMCPMC13387383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.