ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
A dual-branch network with brain region-constrained attention for EEG emotion recognition.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electroencephalography (EEG)-based emotion recognition provides an objective avenue for affective computing. However, the complexity of EEG signals across temporal, frequency, and spatial domains makes any single dimension inadequate. Methods: To overcome these limitations, we propose the Brain Region-Constrained Attention Dual-Branch Network (BRAD-Net). This network adopts a parallel Spatio-Temporal and Spectral-Spatial dual-branch architecture to achieve synergistic multi-domain EEG feature learning. Within the spatio-temporal branch, we introduce a novel Brain Region-Constrained Attention mechanism, which strictly confines self-attention computation to channels belonging to the same brain region. This design not only suppresses irrelevant cross-region interference but also incorporates neuroanatomical priors of brain parcellation, thereby enabling effective and interpretable representation learning. Results: In subject-dependent experiments using 10-fold cross-validation on DEAP and DREAMER datasets, BRAD-Net achieves high accuracies of 97.44%, 97.70%, and 97.97% for valence, arousal, and dominance on DEAP, and 99.66%, 99.78%, and 99.80% on DREAMER, respectively. Leave-one-subject-out validation on DREAMER dataset achieves accuracies of 72.80% and 75.66% for arousal and dominance, respectively. Additionally, the BRAD-Net demonstrates strong cross-paradigm adaptability, achieving 98.21% accuracy on a depression classification dataset. Conclusions: These findings confirm that integrating neuroanatomical priors into a dual-branch multi-dimensional learning framework effectively extracts robust and interpretable neural representations. BRAD-Net not only advances high-performance EEG emotion recognition but also provides a novel, biologically-constrained design paradigm for developing more interpretable brain-computer interface models. By demonstrating that restricting attention to within-brain-region interactions suffices for accurate emotion recognition, our work offers a new theoretical perspective on the application of brain parcellation knowledge in classification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.