ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Mandibular Hemangiomatous Ameloblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mandibular Hemangiomatous Ameloblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemangiomatous ameloblastoma is an exceedingly rare histologic variant of ameloblastoma, characterized by extensive vascularity. The present case discusses the hemangiomatous ameloblastoma in a 60-year-old male patient. The patient presented with a swelling in the mandibular anterior region that persisted for 2 years. Radiographic examination revealed a unilocular, well-defined hypodense lesion with scalloped borders and multilocular areas extending from the mandibular left first molar to the right second molar. Based on these findings, a primary provisional diagnosis of aggressive odontogenic tumour was made. An incisional biopsy was taken and the lesion was diagnosed as ameloblastoma. Following this, hemimandibulectomy was performed and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination. Microscopic examination demonstrated odontogenic epithelial islands with peripheral columnar ameloblast-like cells, stellate reticulum-like cells replaced by proliferating round cells, and extensive endothelial-lined vascular channels filled with red blood cells. The lesion showed plexiform patterns, dentinoid-like material and areas of calcification. The final diagnosis was given as hemangiomatous ameloblastoma. Hemangiomatous ameloblastoma differs from conventional ameloblastomas in its vascular components, with proposed etiopathogenetic mechanisms including angiogenesis, hamartomatous malformation, or epigenetic VEGF expression. Despite its rarity and vascularity, treatment follows conventional ameloblastoma protocols. Surgical management poses challenges due to its potential profuse bleeding. Although its biological behaviour and recurrence rates are not fully understood, this case highlights the importance of including vascular lesions in differential diagnoses and highlights the need for further studies to elucidate its etiopathogenesis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.