Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2026
Immunogenicity and safety of primary three-dose series with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (acellular, three components) combined vaccine, adsorbed in 3 months infants.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05951725 (A Randomized, Blinded, Positive Vaccine-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of DTcP in Infants and Children at 2 and 3 Months of Age), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Blinded, Positive Vaccine-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of DTcP in Infants and Children at 2 and 3 Months of Age
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a novel diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (acellular, three components) combined vaccine, adsorbed (DTcP) vaccine compared to the existing co-purified DTaP vaccine in China. In this partially randomized, blinded, controlled Phase III trial, we assessed a DTcP vaccine against two controls: a licensed co-purified DTaP and a DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine. A total of 1,140 infants (3 months old) received a 3-dose primary series at 3, 4, and 5 months. Both of DTcP and co-purified DTaP had lower incidences of overall adverse reactions than the DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine (17.99%/18.08% vs. 21.96%). The DTcP vaccine demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority over the co-purified DTaP for anti-PT and anti-FHA immunogenicity. In addition, the DTcP achieved a 98.16% seroconversion rate for anti-FHA, versus only 14.29% for the co-purified DTaP. Besides, DTcP vaccine also induced high antibody level in GMC results. Specifically, the anti-PT GMC was 85.10 in the DTcP group versus 49.86 in the DTaP group ( Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier NCT05951725.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.