ArticleCureus2026
Hemodynamic Outcomes of Anesthesia Management Assisted by Nurses Trained in Specific Medical Acts in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Task-shifting in anesthesia care is increasingly recognized as a vital approach to managing anesthesiologist shortages. In Japan, a national certification system for Nurses Trained in Specific Medical Acts (NTSMAs) was introduced to support perioperative management. This pilot study aimed to compare intraoperative hemodynamic outcomes between NTSMA-assisted anesthesia management and physician-only management in gastrointestinal surgery using a propensity score-matched design. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia between 2023 and 2026. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted using age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), and surrogate markers of anticipated procedural complexity (anesthesia time and surgical time) to balance baseline characteristics between the NTSMA-assisted group and the physician-only control group. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative hypotensive screening events, defined as systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg at least once. Secondary outcomes included total intraoperative doses of vasopressors, including phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine. Results After 1:1 matching, 99 pairs (total N = 198) were analyzed, with all covariates achieving a standardized mean difference of <0.1. The incidence of intraoperative hypotensive screening events was not significantly different between the NTSMA-assisted and physician-only groups (67.7% vs. 64.6%). Conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated no statistically significant association between NTSMA involvement and hypotensive events (OR: 1.150, 95% CI: 0.632 to 2.094, p = 0.648). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in total intraoperative requirements, evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, for phenylephrine (p = 0.385), norepinephrine (p = 0.930), or ephedrine (p = 0.069). Conclusions In this retrospective pilot study, NTSMA-assisted anesthesia management did not show a statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative severe hypotension compared with physician-only management. However, given the limited sample size and the highly sensitive nature of our primary outcome, these findings should be considered strictly hypothesis-generating. Larger, prospectively designed non-inferiority trials are required to definitively establish the clinical safety and non-inferiority of NTSMA-assisted task-shifting in anesthesia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.