ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Impacts of Pain Characteristics on the Outcomes of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Self-Controlled Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia are increasingly prevalent and associated with substantial pain burden and reduced quality of life. Despite the increasing use of neuromodulation strategies such as stSCS, evidence on their effects across pain phenotypes remains limited. Aim: To investigate the heterogeneous pain characteristics of postherpetic neuralgia and to explore how different pain phenotypes respond to stSCS. Design: A prospective self-controlled study. Methods: LCA was used to identify different pain phenotypes, followed by LMM to evaluate differential responses after stSCS in pain, anxiety, ADL and sleep. The report was guided by the STROBE checklist. Results: A total of 207 patients were included. StSCS was effective in improving pain, anxiety and sleep status in patients with PHN, although a reduction in ADL was also observed. LCA identified two distinct pain phenotypes: Typical irritative phenotype (Class 1) and Atypical high-burden phenotype (Class 2). Differential treatment responses were observed between the two phenotypes, with Class 1 showing greater pain relief and sleep improvement, whereas Class 2 exhibited a higher symptom burden and a comparatively weaker response to stSCS. Conclusion: This study confirms the clinical efficacy of stSCS in patients with PHN and demonstrates heterogeneity in treatment response across distinct pain phenotypes. These findings underscore the importance of pre-treatment pain phenotype stratification to inform individualized stSCS-based management strategies and support the integration of a multidisciplinary approach for high-burden phenotypes to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.