ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Temporal changes in the discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep: an in-home electroencephalography study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep misperception has traditionally been attributed to neurophysiological abnormalities or psychological traits; however, most evidence is based on single-night or laboratory-based assessments. This raises the possibility that misperception may partly reflect measurement limitations rather than stable individual pathology. This study aimed to examine whether sleep misperception changes across consecutive nights and to identify variability-based phenotypes using repeated in-home electroencephalography (EEG). Methods: Eighty-three adults (40-64 years) underwent 7 consecutive nights of in-home EEG monitoring and completed daily sleep questionnaires (OSA-MA). Sleep misperception was quantified using the Sleep Perception Index (SPI), and participants were classified as underestimators ( Results: Sleep misperception decreased over time, particularly among overestimators ( Discussion: These findings suggest that sleep misperception is not a fixed trait but a dynamic phenomenon that evolves with repeated measurement. Distinct variability patterns across sleep domains further indicate that misperception reflects instability in sleep quantity and quality rather than a single underlying mechanism. Multi-night, ethologically valid monitoring may therefore provide a more accurate framework for understanding and assessing sleep perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.