Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Virologic Outcomes With Lenacapavir in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Multicenter Real-World Study.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class long-acting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid inhibitor, has demonstrated potent antiviral activity in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH) in clinical trials, but real-world data remain limited. We describe outcomes from 6 US HIV clinics using LEN-based regimens in a largely HTE cohort of PWH to assess virologic response, regimen potency, and tolerability. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults with HIV who initiated LEN between November 2020 and June 2025 at 6 clinics in Chicago, Illinois and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Demographic, clinical, and genotypic data were abstracted from electronic health records. Virologic suppression was defined as HIV viral load <200 copies/mL. Stanford genotypic susceptibility scores (S-GSS) were calculated to assess regimen potency. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared antiretroviral therapy pill burden and regimen potency before and after LEN initiation. Results: Seventy PWH initiated LEN. Median follow-up was 12 months. At baseline, 18 (26%) PWH with available genotypes had multidrug-resistant HIV, and 54% had unsuppressed virus. Among 38 PWH with unsuppressed virus, 34 (89%) achieved viral suppression, and none of the PWH with suppressed HIV experienced rebound. LEN significantly improved regimen potency ( Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, LEN-based regimens achieved high rates of virologic suppression, improved regimen activity, and reduced pill burden with good tolerability. LEN represents a promising salvage therapy for PWH, warranting equitable and implementation-focused integration into HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.