ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Personalized Biologic Therapy for Refractory Bullous Pemphigoid: Sequential Omalizumab, Dupilumab, and Rituximab.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease that predominantly affects elderly individuals. Systemic corticosteroids remain a mainstay of therapy but are often limited by comorbidities and treatment-related adverse effects. We report a 73-year-old man with refractory BP and multiple comorbidities who underwent sequential biologic therapy with omalizumab, dupilumab, and rituximab. The diagnosis was supported by typical clinical manifestations, subepidermal blistering, markedly elevated anti-BP180 antibody levels, peripheral eosinophilia, and elevated total IgE, although direct immunofluorescence was negative and indirect immunofluorescence was not performed. Omalizumab did not produce an early clinical response within two weeks, but its efficacy could not be fully evaluated because of the short treatment duration. Dupilumab induced the most rapid clinical improvement; however, relapse occurred after treatment discontinuation due to financial constraints. Rituximab was subsequently administered and contributed to sustained disease control and corticosteroid tapering. This case highlights the complexity of individualized biologic selection in refractory BP and suggests that clinical phenotype, serological profile, treatment response, corticosteroid-sparing needs, safety considerations, and economic accessibility should be integrated when developing personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.