ArticleRadiology advances2026
OpenMAP-BrainAge: generalizable and interpretable brain age predictor from MRI.
Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Infancy to Aging: Precise Brain Age Estimation via Hybrid CoTResNet3D and CrossViT Models on T1-Weighted Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accurately estimating brain age can help identify deviations linked to neurodegenerative diseases, underscoring the need for robust models that accurately perform across heterogenous cohorts. Purpose: To develop an age prediction model that is interpretable and robust to demographic and technological variations in brain MRI. Materials and Methods: We propose a transformer-based brain age model that analyzes 3D T1-weighted MRI. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE). Associations between brain age gap (BAG, ie, predicted minus chronological age) and chronological age were evaluated in cognitive normal (CN) participants. Clinical relevance was assessed by examining BAG differences across cognitive groups and correlations with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Results: We achieved an MAE 3.65 years on ADNI2 & 3 and OASIS3 test sets, and a high generalizability of MAE of 3.54 years on AIBL. In dementia, a notable increase in brain age gap (BAG) along with cognitive decline, with a mean of 0.15 years (95% CI: [-0.22, 0.51]) in CN, 2.55 years ([2.40, 2.70]) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 6.12 years ([5.82, 6.43]) is noted. Negative correlation between BAG and cognitive scores was observed after adjustment for covariates, with Conclusion: Our model effectively integrated multiview and volumetric information to achieve state-of-the-art brain age prediction, with improved generalizability, interpretability, and association with cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.