ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Post-Cementation Sensitivity of Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Clinical Study of Glass Ionomer and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This clinical study evaluated post-cementation sensitivity after zirconia crown cementation using two luting agents: a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I) and a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram). Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients requiring zirconia crown restorations were included in the study and randomly allocated to one of two groups according to the luting cement used. In Group I, zirconia crowns were cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji I), whereas in Group II they were cemented with self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Calibra Ceram). Post-cementation sensitivity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2 hours after cementation and after 14 days. Sensitivity was evaluated in response to cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As the data were not normally distributed, intragroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and intergroup comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Results: At both evaluation times, the Fuji I group showed higher sensitivity scores than the Calibra Ceram group for cold, heat, and biting stimuli. Cold and heat sensitivity decreased significantly from baseline to day 14 in both groups. For biting sensitivity, a significant reduction was observed in the Fuji I group, whereas the reduction in the Calibra Ceram group was not statistically significant. Between-group comparisons showed significantly lower sensitivity scores in the Calibra Ceram group for all tested stimuli at both time points. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, zirconia crowns cemented with self-adhesive resin cement showed lower post-cementation sensitivity than those cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement. The type of luting cement may therefore influence early postoperative sensitivity and patient comfort following zirconia crown cementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.