ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2026
Consensus-based Sharp-Wave Ripple detection and its application in an alcohol administration model.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the hippocampus, slow waves are accompanied by brief population bursts of high-frequency oscillations (150-250 Hz) known as Sharp-Wave Ripples (SWRs), a phenomenon associated with memory consolidation during offline brain states and Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep. Despite the relevance of SWRs, no standardized criterion for their automatic detection has been established. This work introduces a consensus-based algorithm that first identifies sharp waves and then detects ripples occurring within these intervals. Events are designated as true SWRs only when at least two principal methodologies report overlapping detections. Comparative analyses showed that one detector generated more candidate events but with reduced precision, whereas the other was more selective but computationally slower. The consensus strategy improved reliability by emphasizing the concurrence of independent detectors, contributing to efforts toward standardized and reproducible SWR analysis. The algorithm was used within an alcohol administration model to quantify SWR rate, duration, and peak frequency across control, vehicle, and treated groups. Although no significant group-level differences emerged under the short-term exposure protocol, a significant increase in SWR peak frequency was observed in the treated group after the open field test, suggesting the presence of a transient compensation mechanism. These findings shed light on the brain's ability to adapt temporarily to specific behavioral tasks. However, it is essential to emphasize that additional research is crucial to fully understand the long-term implications and associations with alcohol-induced changes in brain structures and SWR generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.