ArticleBrain communications2026
Uncovering hidden pathways: structural brain networks under connected speech in post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with post-stroke aphasia, an acquired language disorder, face significant communication challenges essential for daily life. Surprisingly, little is known about how focal brain damage disrupts the bilateral anatomical integration of language and multiple-demand brain networks required for higher level, connected spoken language following aphasic stroke. To address this, we investigated the anatomical network correlates of spoken language abilities in a selective subgroup of thirty-six individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia who had preserved single-word comprehension and monosyllabic word repetition (mean age 59 ± 12.51 years; 26 males/10 females) using an innovative methodological framework. Employing a lesion quantification toolkit and graph theory analyses of T1 volumetric MRI brain scans we measured individual's brain structural network efficiency. We then quantified the efficiency of their spoken language abilities using measures of bigram frequency, collocation, and speech connectivity using a frequency language analysis tool. Combining these brain and behavioural data, we found that higher structural efficiency in bilateral language networks significantly correlated with better connected speech abilities. By quantifying the impact of focal lesions on not only the left (dominant) language network but also bilateral language and multiple-demand networks, we were able to account for variance in aphasic's higher level, connected speech abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.