ArticleTransplantation direct2026
Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: A Temporal Classification and Machine Learning Clustering.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation (LTx). PGD is graded at static time points, limiting insight into its temporal dynamics. Statistical risk-factor analysis may overlook the multifactorial complexity of PGD. Machine learning (ML) may address this but is constrained by small sample sizes. We aim to introduce a temporal PGD classification, perform ML-based clustering and overcome sample-size limitations by generating synthetic patient data. Methods: A prospectively collected database of 794 LTx at University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) from January 2012 to November 2023 was analyzed. Recipients were classified into 4 temporal PGD phenotypes: no, early, late, and persistent PGD. Unsupervised ensemble Results: Six hundred ninety primary double LTx cases were included. Temporal PGD phenotypes showed significantly different 5-y survival (log-rank test: Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of temporal PGD classification to better understand how the dynamic character of PGD affects survival. ML techniques, including unsupervised clustering and synthetic data generation, could be promising strategies to unravel complex interactions between clinical factors and overcome sample-size limitations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.