ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026
Vitamin D in pulmonary disease.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing interest in the role of vitamin D in respiratory disorders. Its action as the main regulator of calcium and bone metabolism is well established, but vitamin D is also thought to influence inflammation, immunity and host defence. Accumulating evidence associates vitamin D insufficiency with poorer respiratory outcomes. This narrative review summarises the current literature on the role of vitamin D in inflammatory mechanisms associated with asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis and acute respiratory tract infections. It outlines the existing evidence supporting the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D in respiratory disease. Results from the current literature are mixed, with clinical trial data not always aligning with a plausible mechanistic rationale or data from observational studies. Future large randomised controlled trials, targeting vitamin D deficient cohorts and assessing outcomes over longer durations are needed to provide clarity on the clinical utility of vitamin D supplementation in respiratory disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.