Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482768›Full record

ArticlePublic health reviews2026

Structural barriers to implementing individual placement and support in Japanese disability policies and Labor systems.

Sosei Yamaguchi, Teruo Hayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sosei YamaguchiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Teruo HayashiSeiwakai Nishikawa Hospital, Hamada, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to contextualize structural barriers to the implementation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in Japan. Analysis: We examined the position of Japan's employment service policies for individuals with mental illness within the OECD framework for IPS implementation and identified key challenges. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a narrative search of Japanese policy documents with systematic searches of Japanese IPS research. According to the OECD framework, Japan's IPS implementation was positioned between the stages of "Building the foundations for integrated mental health, skills, and work policy" and "Shifting from trials to a scaled-up integrated approach." A major barrier was the absence of a comprehensive vocational service system for individuals with a diagnosis of severe mental illness. Policy Options: Advancing IPS dissemination in Japan requires multifaceted strategies, including grassroots efforts by service providers, strengthened advocacy, incorporation of employer and client perspectives, and consideration of resource allocation across populations with varying levels of needs. Conclusion: While macro-level research on IPS implementation remains scarce in Japan, the practical and feasible policy considerations identified in this study could be beneficial in Japan as well as other non-Western contexts encountering similar implementation challenges.

Indexed as

employment service policyimplementation and disseminationindividual placement and supportJapanese systemvocational services

Identifiers

PMID42482768
PMCPMC13384904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.