ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Developing a predictive model for early urinary incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To create a predictive model for early urinary incontinence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: This study examined clinical data from 408 patients who received LRP at Xiangyang Central Hospital during the period December 2020 to December 2025. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence or absence of urinary incontinence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of urinary incontinence, which were then used to construct a nomogram. The predictive model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curves. Results: The analysis included 408 patients. Among the participants, 168 (41.2%) were categorized as having urinary incontinence, while 240 (58.8%) were not. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified prostate volume, membranous urethral length (MUL), intravesical prostatic protrusion length (IPPL), clinical staging and neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation as predictors of urinary incontinence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that prostate volume, MUL, IPPL and NVB preservation were independent predictors. Subsequently, a clinical prediction model was developed and visualized as a nomogram, with its discriminative performance evaluated using a ROC curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.910 (95%CI 0.862-0.957), demonstrating good discriminatory power. Good consistency was observed from the calibration curve, and a significant clinical net benefit was shown by the decision curve. Conclusions: The prostate volume, MUL, IPPL and NVB preservation have a good predictive value for early urinary incontinence after LRP, and the resulting nomogram demonstrates good predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.