ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
When tasty becomes threatening: a neurobehavioral perspective on subjective food preferences in eating disorders.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subjective food preferences significantly influence eating behavior, and in eating disorders (EDs), these preferences are often altered. Neuroimaging and neurobehavioral studies have revealed atypical brain responses to food cues in anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED), and these findings may point to disrupted subjective food valuation as a key neurobiological mechanism. This narrative review synthesizes recent findings suggesting that altered reward processing and valuation contribute to the persistence and complexity of disordered eating behaviors. The review is based on a comprehensive search of PubMed and additional citation searching, with study selection guided by conceptual relevance to subjective food valuation, reward processing, and decision-making in EDs. The review begins by outlining the conceptual foundations of subjective valuation and preference formation, followed by empirical evidence of altered reward processing and neural correlates of food valuation in AN, BN, and BED. Studies in clinical populations showing disrupted reward learning and maladaptive food choices are integrated to illustrate disorder-specific patterns. Across EDs, converging evidence indicates disorder-specific alterations in subjective food valuation and reward processing. While AN is characterized by reduced hedonic valuation, diminished reward responsiveness, and increased reliance on cognitive control mechanisms, BN and BED are more strongly associated with heightened hedonic and motivational salience of food cues, alongside dysregulated reward learning and variable engagement of cognitive control systems. The review concludes with a discussion of broader implications, future research directions, and potential clinical applications that emphasize integrating subjective preferences into ED research and treatment. Investigating EDs as disorders of disrupted subjective food valuation offers a unifying neurobehavioral perspective that expands our understanding of ED psychopathology and may lay the groundwork for targeted interventions addressing maladaptive reward processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.