ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Advanced analysis of formulation parameters governing encapsulation efficiency: drug delivery system.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The encapsulation efficiency (%EE), used here as a consistently reported operational proxy for encapsulation performance in literature-derived datasets, in niosomal drug delivery systems has been analyzed using predictive modeling. However, these methods are hardly able to support intervention-oriented reasoning adequately. Therefore, the present study adopts a developed causal discovery framework on a data set of formulation from the literature to reveal assumption-aware causal structures connecting physicochemical drug properties, formulation composition, process conditions, and %EE. The input variables were selected based on consistent reporting across literature sources, physicochemical relevance to niosomal systems, and unambiguous availability in the extracted data, rather than outcome-driven criteria. From 116 observational samples of thin-film hydration only, causal graphs were generated through the combined use of constraint-based (PC Algorithm), score-based (Greedy Equivalence Search (GES)), and functional (Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (LiNGAM)) models. In common with the other methods, %EE was identified as a structurally downstream outcome. At the same time, the intrinsic drug properties (especially lipophilicity) were found to be upstream constraints rather than intervention levers. A notable systematic difference between the importance of features predictive of the model and the causal effect estimates was observed, underscoring that predictive relevance does not imply causal influence. Instead of dictating formulation rules, the framework allows for generating hypotheses, counterfactual exploration, and structured experimental planning under explicit causal assumptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.