Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42482690›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

The weight of society: a qualitative study on how social norms shape body size and weight ideals.

Miguel Alejandro Saquimux Contreras, Ximena Ramos Salas, Silvana Ferreira Bento, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Maria José Martins Duarte Osis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel Alejandro Saquimux ContrerasMedicine Faculty, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ximena Ramos SalasDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Silvana Ferreira BentoMedicine Faculty, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Karla Simônia de PáduaMedicine Faculty, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria José Martins Duarte OsisMedicine Faculty, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Weight bias and stigma have transformed body weight from a purely biological attribute into a complex social phenomenon. Social and health scientists continue to critically examine how weight stigmatising discourses and biased perceptions shape attitudes, beliefs and everyday experiences. Studies show that socially mediated subjectivities profoundly affect women's health-related behaviours and decision-making. This study seeks to explore, from the standpoint of patients attending a gynaecological clinic, how weight bias and stigma influence women's perceptions of their own weight and body size and the healthcare decisions they make. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in a Family Planning Outpatient Clinic in the southeastern region of Brazil. Interviews (n = 6) and focus groups (n = 2, six participants per group) with patients were conducted from February to November 2024. All participants identified as women, and the interviews and focus groups were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach. Findings: The rationality of weight bias and stigma influences how women perceive their weight and body shape. This turns biological functions, such as eating and exercising, into social actions that respond to imposed norms that shape common sense about what is considered a healthy and desirable weight. Interpretation: Medical research and clinical practice often reduce health risk factors to poor personal choices or biological predispositions, while neglecting systemic drivers such as weight bias, stigma and fatphobic representations, medicalised discourses of weight, and neoliberal ideals equating thinness with moral virtue. The rationality behind the embodied realities of women navigating weight-based discrimination reveals how weight bias and stigma shape women's everyday life, social actions and healthcare decisions. Funding: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Indexed as

Gendered weightLifeworldPerceptionPhenomenological sociologyWeight bias and stigma

Identifiers

PMID42482690
PMCPMC13387014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.