ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
The weight of society: a qualitative study on how social norms shape body size and weight ideals.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Weight stigma in Latin America and the Caribbean: a call to action.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weight bias and stigma have transformed body weight from a purely biological attribute into a complex social phenomenon. Social and health scientists continue to critically examine how weight stigmatising discourses and biased perceptions shape attitudes, beliefs and everyday experiences. Studies show that socially mediated subjectivities profoundly affect women's health-related behaviours and decision-making. This study seeks to explore, from the standpoint of patients attending a gynaecological clinic, how weight bias and stigma influence women's perceptions of their own weight and body size and the healthcare decisions they make. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in a Family Planning Outpatient Clinic in the southeastern region of Brazil. Interviews (n = 6) and focus groups (n = 2, six participants per group) with patients were conducted from February to November 2024. All participants identified as women, and the interviews and focus groups were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach. Findings: The rationality of weight bias and stigma influences how women perceive their weight and body shape. This turns biological functions, such as eating and exercising, into social actions that respond to imposed norms that shape common sense about what is considered a healthy and desirable weight. Interpretation: Medical research and clinical practice often reduce health risk factors to poor personal choices or biological predispositions, while neglecting systemic drivers such as weight bias, stigma and fatphobic representations, medicalised discourses of weight, and neoliberal ideals equating thinness with moral virtue. The rationality behind the embodied realities of women navigating weight-based discrimination reveals how weight bias and stigma shape women's everyday life, social actions and healthcare decisions. Funding: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.